AI-Supported Learning Design, Development & Delivery
Saheli Basu · Practice Portfolio

Teaching Fractions Through Visual Models

A fictional-but-realistic example showing how an educator can use LLM-based AI tools to support learning design, development and delivery while retaining professional judgment and responsibility.

Portfolio demonstrates 5 areas lesson design · assessment · communication · resources · repeatable AI-supported workflow

What this portfolio demonstrates

This is not a collection of generic AI-generated worksheets. The educator starts with a learning goal, uses AI tools to question and refine the plan, adapts the resulting materials for learners, and makes the final professional decisions.

Core principle: My expertise → AI as a thinking partner → professional judgment → usable learning materials.

Context

Subject
Mathematics
Topic
Fractions
Stage
Upper primary

The exact year level is intentionally generic; this is a model rather than a claim about a particular classroom.

Learning foundation

This practice portfolio draws on learning from educator-focused AI courses, guidance and supporting online materials, with particular attention to AI fluency, learning design, responsible use and human professional judgment.

AI Fluency for Educators

Claude Academy · Educator-focused course

View course

AI for Educators

OpenAI Academy · Educator-focused course

View course

The portfolio also draws on relevant online guidance, examples and other supporting materials relating to AI, education and learning design. These materials inform the approach; the portfolio represents my own application and professional interpretation.

1

Refined lesson plan

A plan strengthened by teaching expertise and AI-supported refinement
Teacher-facing
Learning goal

Students will explain what a fraction represents and connect fraction notation to visual models.

Success criteria
  • I can identify the fraction represented by a model.
  • I can explain what the numerator and denominator represent.
  • I can represent the same fraction in more than one way.
1 · Warm-up — 5 min

Present a familiar sharing situation. Ask: “How could we represent this mathematically?” Collect several ideas without immediately correcting them.

2 · Explore — 10 min

Students work with fraction circles or drawn models. They identify equal parts and match models to notation.

3 · Discuss — 10 min

Compare representations. Explicitly address the misconception that the denominator tells how many pieces we have.

4 · Apply — 10 min

Students create and label a representation for a given fraction, then explain it to a partner.

5 · Check — 5 min

Exit ticket: “Draw a model for 3/4 and explain what each number tells us.”

Likely misconceptions

  • Reading the denominator as the number of selected pieces.
  • Assuming a larger denominator always means a larger fraction.
  • Using unequal parts in a visual model.

Differentiation

  • Use pre-divided visual models as a scaffold.
  • Provide vocabulary prompts: whole, equal parts, numerator, denominator.
  • Extend confident learners with equivalent fractions and justification.
Human decision point: AI can suggest sequencing, questions and possible misconceptions, but the educator decides whether those suggestions fit the learners, curriculum, context and available time.
2

Student activity & assessment

One core task with support and extension built around the same learning goal
Student-facing
Fraction Detective

Look at each fraction model. What fraction is represented? How do you know? Draw another representation of the same fraction. Then explain your answer to a partner.

Support version

Students receive a model already divided into equal parts, a word bank, and sentence starters:

The whole is… There are… equal parts I shaded… Therefore…

Extension version

“Two students disagree about whether two models represent the same fraction. Decide whether they are equivalent and prove your answer using a diagram and words.”

Quick assessment rubric

Look for Developing Secure Extending
Model Parts may be unequal or unclear. Model shows equal parts accurately. Uses multiple accurate representations.
Notation Needs support connecting numbers to model. Correctly identifies numerator and denominator. Explains relationships and equivalent forms.
Explanation Gives an answer with limited reasoning. Explains how the model supports the answer. Justifies, compares or generalises the reasoning.
3

Communication draft

A family-facing message that is clear, useful and non-alarming
Family-facing

Supporting our fraction learning

Dear Families,

Over the next few lessons, we are focusing on developing students’ understanding of fractions—not just getting the correct answer, but being able to explain how they know.

A simple way to support this at home is to ask questions such as:

  • “How do you know?”
  • “Can you show that another way?”
  • “What does this fraction represent?”

There is no need for additional worksheets or formal practice. Everyday examples involving sharing, portions or comparing quantities can provide useful opportunities for discussion.

Thank you for supporting your child’s learning.

AI use: The communication was refined for clarity and tone. The educator remains responsible for deciding what is appropriate to communicate to families.
4

Supporting resources

A small reusable toolkit that makes the lesson easier to teach
Teacher toolkit

Question bank

  • How do you know?
  • Can you show another way?
  • What does this number represent?
  • What would change if the whole changed?

Vocabulary card

Whole — the complete amount.

Equal parts — parts of the same size.

Numerator — how many equal parts are being considered.

Denominator — how many equal parts make the whole.

Exit ticket

Draw 3/4.

Label the numerator and denominator.

Explain in one sentence what each number tells you.

Teacher observation checklist




Fast reteach prompt

“If I divide one whole into four equal parts, what does one part represent? What would three of those parts represent? Show me before you tell me.”

5

Repeatable AI-supported routine

The workflow I can reuse for future lessons
Reusable workflow
01 · START

Bring my expertise

Write the learning goal, rough activity, context and concerns in my own words.

02 · CHALLENGE

Use AI to probe

Use an LLM-based AI tool to identify gaps, possible misconceptions, weak sequencing and opportunities for stronger questions.

03 · BUILD

Generate variations

Create student tasks, scaffolds, extensions, questions and supporting materials.

04 · JUDGE

Teacher final check

Keep, adapt or reject suggestions based on students, curriculum, context and professional judgment.

Reusable prompt pattern:
“Here is my lesson idea and context. Do not rewrite it immediately. First identify likely misconceptions, gaps and places where students may struggle. Then suggest improvements while preserving my teaching approach. Finally, create a student task, a support option, an extension option and a quick assessment.”

My quality-control checklist

☐ Fits the learning goal
☐ Appropriate for my learners
☐ Sounds like my teaching
☐ Curriculum/context checked
☐ AI suggestions verified
☐ I would actually use it

Portfolio reflection

Using AI did not replace the lesson-design process. It made parts of the process faster and gave me another way to test my thinking. The most useful change was having a repeatable workflow: start with my own expertise, use AI to challenge and expand the idea, then apply professional judgment before anything reaches learners.

Evidence of learning: The five assets above show a progression from one lesson idea to a reusable approach that can be applied to other topics.